|

|

|
Minutes of Asha Seattle meeting
on 06/21/2006.
Venue : RTC LWSD No 414, Morton Johnson
Room, Redmond, WA
Attendees: Srijan,
Palani, Tapoja, Mahadevan, Arvind, Sujit, Vibhavaree, Binay, Vani, Kavita, Ken, Deb, Swati, Manohita, Pavan,Theresa,
Marina, Sri, Anand, Madhavi,
Ashish, Jyotsna, Rahul, Tullika, Priya, Raghav.
Project Co-ordination -
Presenter: Vibhavaree
- Project
co-ordinators update for new/existing
volunteers: Vibhavaree will be in-charge of
check sending, Venky will handle site visits, Sudharshan will handle new project proposals.
- All
project stewards must send their project-specific implications of the
RTE to Vibhavaree as soon as possible.
- Project
stewards need to send checks during April and October. Those who haven’t
sent April checks as yet must do so immediately and get in touch with Vibhavaree regarding this.
Project : Betsy Elizabeth Trust (BET). Presenter: Sujit Kuruvilla
Presentation for a
proposal sent by the Betsy Elizabeth Trust (BET) for a total of $11,300
aiding 4 creches. Details at http://www.ashanet.org/projects/project-view.php?p=704
- Site
visit was completed and found to be satisfactory.
- After
discussions, the following clarifications were sought:
- The
number of hours/day spent by the kids in the different creches.
- The
high teacher to student ratio in certain creches.
- The
role and budget allocation for –reporter-.
- Skewed
electricity and utility expenses across the different centers
- BET
had FCRA clearance
- Driver
and his duties mentioned in the different centers.
- Impact
of this creche on the local community and
progress of the former students.
- The
project was approved after voting:
13 Yes, 0 No
& 7 Abstentions
Project : RHEDT. Presenter: Vani
and Binay
RHEDT status update http://ashanet.org/projects/project-view.php?p=148
- The
project was started in 2001 with the initial intention of procuring land
for a school. Asha Seattle has supported to
the tune of $4000 annually.
- Site
visit was completed by Jessica and found to be unsatisfactory - poor
infrastructure, financial discrepancies, attendance irregularities and
questioned the intentions of the board members with regard to the
functioning of the school.
- Based
on the findings it was decided by vote on a plan to issue an ultimatum
to the board to improve their functioning and provide a proper
transition plan for the kids to enter schools. With 13 Yes and 11
Abstentions, Asha Seattle agreed to extend
conditional support for one more year only to the tune of $3000.
- Based
on the current experience it was agreed to examine
infrastructural-related funding more carefully and perform regular site
visits.
Discussion of items in the RTE
Bill. Presenter: RTE
group
- Introduction
by Ken to get feedback from members and drive towards formulating the
chapter policy statement.
- The
issue of local control versus centralized control of SMCs
was debated.
- The
issue was voted upon - whether to limit the role of SMCs
to being an advisory body; or to expand its role (after recommendations
on how the SMC governing body needs to be constituted) allowing more
powers. The former received 7 votes, while the latter received 9 votes.
There were no abstentions.
- A
consensus for the role of the SMCs could not
be reached and will be re-visited later.
|
|